A proton has a mass of 1. The neutron is the other type of particle found in the nucleus. It was discovered by a British physicist, Sir James Chadwick. The neutron carries no electrical charge and has the same mass as the proton. With a lack of electrical charge, the neutron is not repelled by the cloud of electrons or by the nucleus, making it a useful tool for probing the structure of the atom.
Even the individual protons and neutrons have internal structure, called quarks. Six types of quarks exist. These subatomic particles cannot be freed and studied in isolation. The rest of the periodic table, Elements 3 through , lithium through ununoctium, barely register on a cosmic scale. The rest of the universe, you and I included, is a rounding error. The periodic table is a letdown in another sense, too: Given all its columns and rows, it looks like it should contain dozens of different types of elements, but there are really only a few.
Most of the table's surface is therefore redundant. Gases like oxygen and nitrogen, semiconductors like carbon and silicon, amorphous powders like sulfur—they tend to cluster on the right, especially in the top quadrant. The variety there is dazzling but quickly fades as you move down or to the left. In fact, three-quarters of the elements on the table are metals.
If you built a model of our castle-shaped periodic table by using a brick of each solid element, most of the facade would be a rather dull gray. Still, even though the elements in the top right quadrant are outnumbered—both in terms of the sheer population of atoms in the universe and the spots occupied on the periodic table—they also make up much of our humble home planet.
That's especially true in the top layers of the crust that support life. Your body needs two dozen elements to function, and most are from the top right quadrant. So in that sense, learning about the diversity of the periodic table is not a waste of time you had to see that coming. Indeed, one of the periodic table's most intriguing mysteries is where that diversity of elements came from. For a long time, scientists assumed the elements had just appeared ex nihilo from the Big Bang.
They have since realized that the Big Bang created little but hydrogen and some helium. Instead, the nuclear furnaces operating inside stars like our sun create most elements, by fusing smaller atoms together.
William Prout proposed a unifying 'proto hyle' that gave rise to all matter. It gained fresh credibility from early 20th century advances in nuclear science, and in Henry Moseley demolished a major obstacle to its rehabilitation by using x-rays to order the elements by atomic number rather than mass. When the first world war began Moseley enlisted, and he died at Gallipoli in However, their historical significance becomes clearer if they are viewed alongside the bold proposal Prout made a century earlier.
William Prout was a late developer. He achieved this in , at the relatively mature age of Having graduated as a doctor of medicine in , he spent the customary period walking the wards in London hospitals before qualifying as a licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians in This license allowed him to establish a practice in London, but that was not his only ambition.
Since his days in Bristol he had been actively involved with chemistry, and by he was confident enough to offer some private chemical lectures.
Throughout his medical career, Prout investigated chemical phenomena with biological significance. Chemical analyses were central to his study of conditions affecting the urinary system, like diabetes and kidney stones, and his treatise on them had five English editions and was translated into French and German. However, it was his speculations about the unity of matter which had the greatest impact.
Its title On the relation between the specific gravities of bodies in their gaseous states and the weights of their atoms might seem uncontroversial, but at the time this was a hot topic.
Apparent discrepancies between the gravimetric and volumetric calculations puzzled many chemists. Prout attempted to clarify things by collating information on the relative weights and volumes in which the elements combined, but his article had a sting in its tail.
However, he concluded with another bold speculation. After reiterating that all atomic weights relative to hydrogen appeared to be whole numbers, Prout suggested that hydrogen was the fundamental primary matter from which all substances were composed — the proto hyle proposed by ancient Greek philosophers like Thales.
Several of his contemporaries suspected that many so-called elements were not simple substances. Though frequently criticised, it continued to stimulate debate long after his death in One early supporter was the Scottish chemist Thomas Thomson, whose atomic weight measurements seemed compatible with the hypothesis.
During the s and s Jean-Baptiste Dumas — the leading French chemist of the era — gave it serious consideration. Having measured many atomic weights precisely, he found that they deviated significantly from whole numbers. He also proposed as Dumas had done that non-integral atomic weights might be explained if the ultimate elementary particles had a mass exactly half, or a quarter, of a hydrogen atom.
Meanwhile, discoveries in physics generated fresh arguments for the divisibility of atoms. The English spectroscopists Norman Lockyer and William Crookes claimed that anomalous emission spectra revealed the breakdown of elements under extreme conditions — inside the sun and stars, or in high-voltage electrical discharges. Soddy later decided that the status of several radioactive substances previously thought to be elements was problematic.
Michael Mosley's x-ray experiments gave rise to the periodic organisation of atomic number. Unlike Prout, Moseley grew up in academia.
0コメント